Best MMORPG
-
Jamison
- Power User
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:35 pm
- Location: In line for A-Kon 18 and QuakeCon 07.
Horizon wrote:How come Runescape, BattleOn, and Graal Online aren't included in that list?
Because BattleOn is most likely non existant becaues I never heard of it, Runescape sucks balls, and Graal is a hack and slash mmo. Also the fact less than 1000 people play graal.
America: taking down any threat, no matter how small.
Jamison wrote:Horizon wrote:How come Runescape, BattleOn, and Graal Online aren't included in that list?
Because BattleOn is most likely non existant becaues I never heard of it, Runescape sucks balls, and Graal is a hack and slash mmo. Also the fact less than 1000 people play graal.
BattleOn is a free game you can play on the web. I believe it is similar to Maplestory. What does "hack and slash mmo" mean? Also, Graal Online is completely web based, they don't have advertisements or merchandise in stores, so fewer people know about it.
-
Jamison
- Power User
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:35 pm
- Location: In line for A-Kon 18 and QuakeCon 07.
Horizon wrote:Jamison wrote:Horizon wrote:How come Runescape, BattleOn, and Graal Online aren't included in that list?
Because BattleOn is most likely non existant becaues I never heard of it, Runescape sucks balls, and Graal is a hack and slash mmo. Also the fact less than 1000 people play graal.
BattleOn is a free game you can play on the web. I believe it is similar to Maplestory. What does "hack and slash mmo" mean? Also, Graal Online is completely web based, they don't have advertisements or merchandise in stores, so fewer people know about it.
Go play The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past. There is Graal in it's old form.
Runescape doesn't advertise in stores, but manages to whoops Graal in popularity. Being dubbed "The poor mans WOW", alot will reach out to see it.
America: taking down any threat, no matter how small.
-
Jamison
- Power User
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:35 pm
- Location: In line for A-Kon 18 and QuakeCon 07.
Horizon wrote:I already know that Graal was intended to be a multiplayer Legend of Zelda game. :)
You have a point about Runescape. I wonder how they manage to attract more players than Graal Online.
You are comparing a sucky game to a game which sucks more and has a fan base full of hyper active Jr. High kids.
America: taking down any threat, no matter how small.
Jamison wrote:Horizon wrote:I already know that Graal was intended to be a multiplayer Legend of Zelda game. :)
You have a point about Runescape. I wonder how they manage to attract more players than Graal Online.
You are comparing a sucky game to a game which sucks more and has a fan base full of hyper active Jr. High kids.
Is a fan base the categorization of the people that play it?
-
Jamison
- Power User
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:35 pm
- Location: In line for A-Kon 18 and QuakeCon 07.
Horizon wrote:Jamison wrote:Horizon wrote:I already know that Graal was intended to be a multiplayer Legend of Zelda game. :)
You have a point about Runescape. I wonder how they manage to attract more players than Graal Online.
You are comparing a sucky game to a game which sucks more and has a fan base full of hyper active Jr. High kids.
Is a fan base the categorization of the people that play it?
I'm talking about active players. People who are playing the game within a given point of time. The total amount of active players on Runescape is around a billion. The active players on Graal is less than a thousand.
America: taking down any threat, no matter how small.

